Black Butterfly Effect blog about climate change and global warms The phenomenon news from brazil whereby a small change at one place in a system can have large effects elsewhere, a butterfly flapping its wings in Rio de Janeiro might change the weather in Chicago. (From / / wordnet.princeton.edu) Today We already released 500 billion tons of Carbon to the atmosphere that is a very huge butterfly!
I will expand news from brazil a bit on the legal significance of this moment, but we'll start at the beginning. The hall was packed. Not everyone had a place to sit, and many citizens standing on the side of the hall, mine ear. Before starting the discussion, and after that came all the delegates, members of the Knesset Yachimovitch and Braverman and large public stood in front of everyone and asked: "Is this the representatives of the public? Are there citizens? Looks you raise your hands." news from brazil 95% sitting in the audience raised their hands up with checkmarks. All press cameras started ticking in March. It is. Now it's clear to everyone that the public debate, and he's news from brazil here to monitor closely how affairs are conducted.
Now we can start. So before you a brief summary of what happened in and some points beyond. There will be some legal sections (Hold on), some economic (it will just) and for dessert we add a little soul to everything that happened today. Judges before or after the High Court Hdiion gas exports. Photograph Light Bar-Lev I
One. Judges (especially Gibran and Rubenstein) asked how often the respondents: news from brazil "Why not pass a subject so important and large Knesset?". State's Response: Because it will take time. This is the moment to remind his legislation would go in the first place, the day we were with the law in his hands. MK Ibish Braverman, news from brazil one of the petitioners news from brazil and Chairman Knesset Economics Committee said at the end of the debate the media: I can pass this legislation just a few weeks. My MKs Yachimovitch and Avishii Braverman High Court hearing before me on the export of natural gas light photography - I Bar-Lev news from brazil
Two. While state officials debate (from the Petitions Department State Attorney's Office) spoke about the law gives the government the authority to make the decision without having to bring it to the Knesset, representatives of the companies made sure to walk Amis continue with the eternal spin: If there is no export will not be funding the development of other reservoirs. news from brazil Then While it does not touch the question of legal standing news from brazil before the judges - whether news from brazil the government had the authority or not - but the spirit of the threats floated well in the theater, and there is a possibility that it will also impact on the judges. sadly I say.
Three. Legal spin placed in a threatening sword court: "If the government's decision will be canceled, under existing law allowed gas companies to sign contracts to export everything." Justice Miriam Naor impeded and kept asking if it's true, and it was evident that she buys this argument. This scenario obviously delusional leaning perhaps a loophole (so said a lawyer).
Four. State representative argued throughout the hearing that the government decision to violation of basic rights of the individual or of the public. It is important to clarify something important: Gas is not a normal product for export. It's not orange or flowers. It is a strategic, energy news from brazil security for generations ahead, and it has to affect the fundamental rights of the public and of the individual and how our existence. I hope that the judges Iiodaim it.
Five. The legal debate today concerns the interpretation of the Petroleum Law. This is an old law from 1952 that predicted the current situation with the gas. Gas is important to be clear - is significantly different from oil. While exports of oil can be stopped at various stages that contracts are contracts signed in the short-term gas contracts this story for decades. news from brazil In other words touched you go. I do not know if this difference will be the judges before me, but at least you'll know.
In. Members struggle economist Dror Reshef sustainable economy from the association told us at the end of the hearing that the Sheshinski Committee Report (Appendix E) presented economic models show that half of its total purchases local to 10 years to fund the development of a whale. That is - there is funding from local use only.
Seven. Theme not up for discussion is the issue of transparency. It was long the government can deliver its decision legally Knesset. She avoided due to her fear of transparency. And I have to ask: Is not this right is a fundamental element of democratic public?
Eight. Money knows buy excellent legal representation. This is the truth of our lives right now. Representatives of the gas companies were shrewd lawyers first class, who know the judges, and they knew exactly what to say and how to say. Money knows buy excellent legal representation, that is the truth of our lives. Meanwhile.
On the other side, the lawyers representing our side did a complex, complicated and impressive. Do not just come and claim that this decision is the government news from brazil authority, it is a matter that until now has not been tested. I remind news from brazil Knesset legal advisor news from brazil thinks the same and the Attorney General as we think in principle (but confirmed this decision specifically).
This is not a simple point legally, and our lawyers have made great efforts to move it. They also took down quite a few arguments of the representatives of the gas companies, such as the claim that the mother canceled the government's decision to export gas companies will start from tomorrow everything.
Nine. Following the discussion, I spoke with courts and commentators writings were fiction to learn from them what they think. news from brazil I admit I like quite a few of us, they were impressed judges have difficulty cancel news from brazil the government's decision. That way you can say that the debate had not warned us. It's true. But ...
10. But! It is important to remember that the discussion in court is only part of the considerations that weigh judges. Petition them have reasoned and authoritative, which includes an interpretation of existing law mirror legislative intent conceived it in 1952 (the subject was mentioned in the discussion). The discussion today is not the end all. But I admit that our chances are not great, judging only by the mood in the hall today.
11th. One last point. After waving news from brazil threats gas company representatives, judges narrowed the question now facing a legal point: Is the government's decision was given authority or not. At this point it is important to understand that we are talking about one small section, one of the old law. Legal arena Net
No comments:
Post a Comment